Vasily noise, the leader of the "center", which recently came to Moscow vehemently opposed positions majors pursue listeners, mp3 files from the network. In an interview with Alexander Ivy on radio "Echo of Moscow", he said about the position of the majors: - you know, to my regret, that these so-called "major labels", so I call it the big studio musical, but now all media companies because they. include movie studios, TV stations, radio stations, magazines, they are fully behind the times That is, I have a song over time. That is, they are completely out of step with the time. Not that they are, as they say, chest forward or behind - they were in a different millennium, they have such a business model of record on a phonograph, when she recorded advertised, and sold in stores and they are now in this stage and stood up. And they are rather late for the advent of the Internet and easy access ... like you said? Leased line. If the 5-megabyte file can be downloaded for 10-seconds. And they have, because of what they left behind, the only thing they can do - any criminal action, they usually take in a very bad light, because it shows to assess their own customers. That is, when you get to the hairdresser, for example, a haircut, you begin to assess the barbershop for a haircut that you have come. Here is a theater of the absurd is reached. Or as they say in America, they shoot at their own pace. This arc is obtained. - But you do not have hair scissors for free, you pay money for it, and file sharing - is something free, freebie, as we used to say. - But you know, to go to the hairdresser, do not pay up to 5000 dollars to shave bald, there is a "market value" shave off that the market price, because at the next corner is another hairdresser that you will for $ 5 very fast and again. And my hairdresser sets prices in 5000 dollars to shave their heads to zero, and all that offer to assess select shave his head for $ 5. And because I have a very large company, I filled Sea Bar, all the complaints is intimidating, and the whole thing really happened so urgent, that is to shake all the money from the students, single mothers, some retirees. People live in some nursing homes who do not even know what they are doing. Come on, will make the music on the site, you will hear us. And they have some detectives that consider IP numbers from, to look through, then send these require the issuance of numbers and names of the companies that provide admission to the Internet. That is, it is a witch hunt. There on the site that we centromania.com is my comment here about this problem, that criminal responsibility for listening to music ... you know, it is as if you have any religious beliefs did not have those of the Middle Ages, then you just placed on the fire, and so on a slow charcoal fire, that you still suffer a little longer - it is the same, only in our time, in this hi-tech, this burning at the stake. First, it is completely unacceptable, and secondly, it is a theater of the absurd. This is nonsense - do it. Instead of encouraging people to develop an interest in music in order to explain it somehow, to form in what is good or bad, to awaken in them a good taste in music, she showered them with lawsuits and comes naturally, they are simply as "settlement" - like this: Now, how much money you have, I have ... I was to rescue the institution, 10 thousand dollars, so let's all there is, and we fall back on you, or you meet life 5 years in prison, plus 100,000 for the life you pay. At this level - just knock something. And someone has calculated a lot of money, which they have done. Simply squeezing money. But those companies that produce music and movies, they have some intimidating racketeer organizations. Either you pay, or we will go to jail At this level. And who bullied. Single mothers, low-income families and students But this is just a natural indignation any musician who has any idea of justice. In the end, everything depends on what the musician has some work, it is necessary that this work has heard talk about dollars and cents, or a vanity that this work has heard, when he knows that the work can not by the musician not thrilled to hear. That's where we are now.
No comments:
Post a Comment